What is BSA Section 100 in IEA?

BSA Section 100 (100. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.) now corresponds to IEA Section 97 — 97. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.. The text is substantially unchanged.

The text is substantially unchanged

BSA Section 100 is now IEA Section 97

100. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.

See the full comparison table

Old law

BSA §100

100. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.

100.When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it doesnot apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply.

Illustration.

A agrees to sell to B "my land at X in the occupation of Y". A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.

97. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.

97. When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply.

Illustration

A agrees to sell to B “my land at X in the occupation of Y”. A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.